lunes, 12 de octubre de 2015

Un largo camino, y la obertura de los tontos. Mi primer intento en hiperrealismo, ya le pondré algún nombre

No me pidais demasiado, conseguir subir esta imagen al blogger ha sido una odisea desquiciente. La foto está hecha con móvil, no he podido enviarla a la red porque estaba caída, así que me la he tenido que mandar en un mensaje.
Tampoco he podido editarla en photoshop porque no he tenido acceso al programa en todo el día, estoy que hecho chispas por los ojos.
Así que está retocada con Gimp, pero en portátil, y con muchos problemas para grabarla.

Es el primer intento en hiperrealismo y conlleva un trabajo indescriptible, porque sólo dedico a este tipo de dibujo un día a la semana. Así que semana tras semana tengo que llegar a las clases de dibujo, ponerme rápidamente en modo visualización y pintar pelo tras pelo al bicho.
El animalito, por cierto, ni existió ni lo va a hacer nunca. Es totalmente inventado, y ahí radica la mayor parte del mérito de este dibujo. Que tengo que hacerlo con todo tipo de detalle a partir de lo que visualizo en mi cabeza.

¿Parece fácil?. Qué es lo que tengo que imaginar:
  • Cómo le incide la luz.
  • Cada detalle de la cabeza, las pequeñas protuberancias, arrugas, remolinos del pelo y plumas (tiene de los dos), el color del pelaje, el brillo de los ojos, la comisura de la boca, el arco del cuello, y muchos detalles más que no voy a perder tiempo en enumerar.
  • Cada una de las cosas anteriores bajo la luz que he decidido darle, para hacerle el sombreado. Una protuberancia es completamente distinta según esté más o menos iluminada, si la luz le llega por arriba, si está en el lado contrario del iluminado. Pues esto con cada detalle del dibujo.
Y por si esto fuera poco, lo hago en clases de dibujo, donde los compañeros se dedican a contar sus pequeñas batallas cotidianas, que me tienen hasta las mismas cejas. O lo que más me saca de quicio, que intenten juzgar esto a partir de lo que han aprendido copiando. Quien quiera saber cual es la diferencia que se ponga a hacer un dibujo de este estilo por su cuenta.
Pensar en estas cosas me hace perder la concentración que necesito para hacer esto. Supongo que por esto no se me va esta canción: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLbYL10c1zo

Supongo que ya he echado algún demonio fuera y puedo continuar con lo mío.

miércoles, 7 de octubre de 2015

Why-are-bats-the-only-flying-mammal? (¿Por qué los murciélagos son los únicos mamíferos que vuelan?)

(If someone ask why some animals are the way they are, chances are forth they recieve a long explanation about the way evolution proceeds, in which they will be told that it evolution is random and unpredictible.

I.Don't.Agree.Period.

Some paths in evolution are quite more predictible and understandable examining the enviromental and mechanic stress forces that organisms had to face as well the difficulties of acquiring some new structures that would allow them to overcome the aforementioned factors.
I don't think that Darwinian theory of evolution is the epithome of all theories regarding this fact, in fact I find it poor in explaining evolution. Its major contribution has been telling that there is a selection among the organisms before reaching reproduction. This is not more than pure observation of the facts. But it fails to give any perspective about pure mechanical forces acting on the way organisms changes. Worse than that, the absurd scenario in the USA, with the advantages given to creationists that try to depict their beliefs as an acceptable scientific theory, has driven to a fierce defence of the randomness and unpredictibility of the proccess, forgotting that other sciences can as well as pure observation can give us important clues about how change operates.)
 ---------------

¡Los Murciélagos no son Ciegos!
Grabado de Haeckel de los murciélagos.  http://www.taringa.net/comunidades/derribando-mitos/7204419/Los-Murcielagos-no-son-Ciegos.html



In spite that they are "the only", we shouldn't forget that bats are over 1000 different species, in fact the second largest order of mammals by the number of species, only outnumbered by rodents.
Also, we shouldn't forget that "the only" extant archosaurs are birds. And that there is only one more order of flying vertebrates, the extinct pterosauria order.
And that actual flight only evolved once in invertebrates, in insects, and three times in vertebrates, the mentioned bats, birds and pterosaurs.
So, as mammals we have been very lucky to have an order of flying animals.

But why only once?. The easiest answer is to say that evolution doesn't have intention or direction, it happens because it happens. This type of explanation never convices me.
The mechanic explanation is that flight is very difficult to evolve in tetrapods (that is vertebrates with four limbs), because the adapatations to achieve it are very demanding.
A tetrapod has to dedicate a pair of their limbs to fly, evolve an efficient way to power it, decrease the weight of its skeleton and body in general to make it possible, gain an efficient way of mantaining basic metabolism while flying (birds have very especialized adaptations in their breathing system), and in placental mammals females have to find a way of develop a successful gestation even while flying.
All in all, an actually self powered flight demands too many adaptations, so the chances of getting it are really low.

How do bats fly? (¿Cómo vuelan los murciélagos?)

Generalities about requirements to fly
Any animal that wants to fly, including a human that takes a plane, must care about three matters:

- The force of gravity: It is neccessary to generate 'lift' an upwards force   equivalent to, or greater than the downwards force of gravity.

- The force neccessary to 'push' itself forward in the air, and be able  to manoeuvre, i.e. turn, twist, sommersault etc, and sometimes to go backwards. 

- The resistance that air opposes to its advance, air is a viscose medium, this 'drag' resistance will be stronger the faster the animal goes.  Also, the air has currents in it and moving anything through creates vortices and other irregularities of flow.





Efficiency of bats' flight
Anyone  who has watched a bat flying will know bats are good at  this.  They can in  fact fly very well, so it is obvious their wings  overcome the problems  and do all three of these jobs well. But how well?. Although the idea that bats are less skilled flyers than birds, scientists are showing that we have to review this assumption.

  • Bats use less energy to fly: Studies that  compared oxygen consumption among birds, insects and bats of  similar sizes (a hummingbird, a small bat and a large moth, for example)  use   less energy to fly.
    • Bats are extremely  manouverable animals, often capable of rapid changes  in direction (prey  capture, manouvering, capture evasion, etc). This ability has raised attention not only in biologists but in aerospace investigators. "Bats seem to be mostly specialized for agile and maneuverable flight in complex environments," according to Geoffrey Spedding, a   University of Southern California. "In   broad generalities, bats are characterized by a darting, sharply   turning and maneuvering flight. This can be seen as they wheel about   catching insects, or flit from flower to flower," Spedding added.

    So, how do bats do it so efficently?

    To oppose the force of gravity the generalized trick among all flying animals is to use their body, and specially the wings to generate a negative pressure above them that 'sucks' them up. The 'Lift' force is generated by a combination of the shape of the  wing and the  passage of air across it.
    Basically this is because the  wings of bats  are not flat,  but are shaped like an aerofoil - meaning  they are an  irregular concave shape.   Because of the curvature of the  wing the air  that moves over the top of the wing has further to travel  to get  across the wing, thus it speeds up.  This causes the air pressure  above  the wing to drop because the same amount of air is exerting its   pressure over a greater area. Therefore, any given point experiences   less pressure. This effectively sucks the wing up.
    Meanwhile  the air going below the wing experiences the opposite  effect. It slows  down, generates more pressure and effectively pushes  the wing up.  Hence a bat with air moving over its wings is pulled up  from above and  pushed up from below at the same. The more curved the  aerofoil, and the  greater the speed of the airflow, the greater the  lift, providing the  degree of curvature does not impede the flow of air.
    From  this you can realise that larger wings will generate more lift  than  smaller wings. The adverse side of this is that the larger your  wings  are the greater the energy requirements of flapping, and the  greater  stresses there are on the physical structure of the wings.  Larger wings  are also harder to turn, which means reduced  maneouvrability.  Therefore there are limits to how large an animals  wings can actually  be.
    Secondly we can see that flying  faster generates more lift per unit  of time than flying slowly.   However it also generates more drag, and,  as drag is proportional to  the third power of the speed, with each unit  increase in speed the  costs of overcoming the created drag not only  increase, but increase  faster than the energetic benefits generated by  the increased lift,  hence a point is soon reached where flying faster  costs more than it is  worth.
     


But, what are the secrets of bats' wings?
the wings of bats have an amazing versatility of movements and shape control that seems to be based in:
- Their membranes and multiple joints.
- Their long loose muscles embedded in the skin.
- Their stretchy tendons.

The wing structure of bats and birds differs. Birds have feathers projecting back from   lightweight, fused arm and hand bones. Bats have flexible, relatively   short wings with membranes stretched between elongated fingers.
Spedding   said while birds can open their feathers like a Venetian blind, bats   have developed a twisting wing path that increases the lift during the   upstroke.
The joints and membranes of their wings give bats great control of the shape of them,as slow motion videos of bats flying show.
Unlike insects and birds, which  have relatively rigid wings that can move in only a few directions, a bat’s wing contains more  than  two  dozen joints that are overlaid by a thin elastic membrane  that can  stretch to  catch air and generate lift in many different ways. This gives bats an   extraordinary amount of control over the  three-dimensional shape their  wings  take during flight.

What is more, their  wings have long muscles embedded in the skin, running front to  back,  and not attached to any bones. Scientists had suspected that  these  muscles probably helped shape the wings in flight, but evidence  was  lacking.
Now,  in experiments at  Brown University with Jamaican fruit bats, investigators have found signs that  the muscles do  indeed contract on the downstroke when bats are flying.


One more surprise are that  bats' stretchy bicep and tricep  tendons are crucial for storing and  releasing the energy the creatures  require for takeoff.
Taking off of those critters has long perplexed biologists. This activity requires a great expense of energy, and bats seem to be in great anatomical disadvantage for getting it.










A group of scientists at Brown University investigated the matter, using XROMM (X-ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology) technology that integrates   three-dimensional renderings of animals' bone structures into X-ray   video. (XROMM data allow researchers to conduct detailed analyses of   animals' muscle mechanics and anatomy as the creatures moves.) The team   looked in particular at Seba's short-tailed bats --  fruit bats -- X-raying the creatures as they lifted themselves off  the  ground. Analyzing the videos that resulted, the researchers made a   discovery: bats seem to take off into the air by stretching out the   tendons that anchor their bicep and tricep muscles to their bones. They   then compress the tendons to release energy and power their flight   upward.
It seems, in other words, that  bats' stretchy bicep and tricep  tendons are crucial for storing and  releasing the energy the creatures  require for takeoff. As research lead Nicolai Konow explained it:   "By combining information about skeletal movement with information   about muscle mechanics, we found that the biceps and triceps tendons of   small fruitbats are stretched and store energy as the bat launches  from  the ground and flies vertically."
The  bats' stretchy-muscle  analysis seemed to be confirmed by the team's  use of another technology:  fluoromicrometry, in which small, chemically  labeled markers are  implanted directly into muscle -- which in turn  allows researchers to  measure changes in muscle length during  contractions with high  precision.
And that's a big finding: most scientists had previously believed, Smithsonian Magazine points out,   that small mammals' tendons are too stiff, and too thick, to be   stretched at all. The X-rays revealed otherwise, however, and the Brown   team presented their findings last week at a meeting of the Society for Experimental Biology.   And they've presented their videos to the rest of us, thankfully, so   that we may be appropriately astounded and creeped out by the unique   biology of bats.
How Bats Take Flight, Revealed by X-Ray.

http://www.earthlife.net/mammals/bat-flight.html
Why Bats Are More Efficient Flyers Than Birds
High Metabolism Fueled Evolution of Bat Flight
How Bats Take Flight, Revealed by X-Ray.
 
 
 
 

jueves, 1 de octubre de 2015

What are some highly intelligent mammal species that are true herbivores?



The smartest mammals I can think of aside from humans are mostly omnivores (dogs, pigs, chimpanzees) with some carnivores (dolphins, cats) and the only herbivore I can think of that's considered intelligent is the elephant. Are they smarter than say cows or rhinos or kangaroos?

Answer
Haven't anybody mentioned Orangs so far?. They are mainly frugivore. 
We do it better in recognizing intelligence in species that remind our own behaviour in some way. I would add that lay people tend to overrate carnivorous animals, due to simplistic interpretation of them as "winners", and that behaviour researches tend to make experimets baised towards social animals.
Thus, hervibores, solitary animalsand those that mix these two characteristiques are perceived as less smart.
There is this funny video that somebody shared with me of a cow opening the mechanisms that trap them when eaten in line feeders in milk farms (and excuse me, I don't know the exact translation of these terms, but if you see the video you'll understand what I say and have a fun time, especially at the end of the pic. Notice that the cow know how to open the thing independently wether they trap her or a fellow, using different techniques). 
Cows and goats are true hervibores, ruminants, that's why I selected these species. Somebody could argue that they ingest a lot of insects with their grass...but, let's be serious, those animals evoved their stomachs to digest plants efficently.